Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cervical Pessary versus Expectant Management for the Prevention of Delivery Prior to 36 Weeks in Women with Placenta Previa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

  • Irene A. Stafford
  • , Irene A. Stafford
  • , Thomas J. Garite
  • , Kimberly Maurel
  • , C. Andrew Combs
  • , Kent Heyborne
  • , Richard Porreco
  • , Michael Nageotte
  • , Susan Baker
  • , Sameer Gopalani
  • , Chi Dola
  • , Helen How
  • , Anita F. Das
  • Louisiana State University
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of California, Irvine
  • The Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Mednax, Inc., Sunrise, Florida.
  • Hospital Authority
  • Obstetrix Medical Group of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
  • University of South Alabama
  • Obstetrix Medical Group of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Tulane University
  • Norton Healthcare
  • Das Consulting Group, San Francisco, California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective   This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared cervical pessary (CP) versus expectant management (EM) in women with placenta previa between 22.0 and 32.0 in prolonging gestation until ≥ 36.0 weeks' gestation.
Study Design   This study took place from November 2016 to June 2018. Women were randomized to receive either the Bioteque CP or EM. The pessary was removed at ≥ 36.0 weeks unless indicated. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery, with secondary outcomes including need for transfusion, number and duration of antepartum admissions, type of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. A total of 140 patients were needed to show a 3-week prolongation of pregnancy in the pessary group; however, the trial was stopped early due to budgetary issues.
Results   Of the 33 eligible women, 17 were enrolled. Although not statistically significant, the mean GA at delivery in the CP group was greater than women in the EM group (36.5 ± 1.23 vs. 36.0 ± 2.0;  p   = 0.1673). The number and duration of antepartum admissions was greater in the EM group (2.7 ± 0.58 vs. 16.0 ± 22.76 days;  p   = 0.1264) as well.
Conclusion   Although the study was underpowered to determine the primary outcome, safety and feasibility of CP in pregnancies complicated with previa were demonstrated.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology Reports
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • placenta previa
  • pessary
  • hemorrhage
  • preterm birth

Disciplines

  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this