Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current utilization and impact of AI LVO detection tools in acute stroke triage: a multicenter survey analysis

  • Ziad Darkhabani
  • , Rime Ezzeldin
  • , Adam Delora
  • , Omar Kass-Hout
  • , Yazan Alderazi
  • , Thanh N Nguyen
  • , Mohammad El-Ghanem
  • , Tunmi Anwoju
  • , Zuhair Ali
  • , Mohamad Ezzeldin
  • Cardiology, Corpus Christi Medical Center, Corpus Christi, USA.
  • Jordan University of Science and Technology
  • Department of Emergency Medicine
  • Research Office, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX.
  • Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience
  • Boston University Medical Center
  • Department of Neurology
  • Department of Clinical Sciences
  • Department of Neuroendovascular Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection are increasingly used in acute stroke triage to expedite diagnosis and intervention. However, variability in access and workflow integration limits their potential impact. This study assessed current usage patterns, access disparities, and integration levels across U.S. stroke programs.

METHODS: Cross-sectional, web-based survey of 97 multidisciplinary stroke care providers from diverse institutions. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics, AI tool usage, access, and integration. Two-proportion Z-tests assessed differences across institutional types.

RESULTS: Most respondents (97.9%) reported AI tool use, primarily Viz AI and Rapid AI, but only 62.1% consistently used them for triage prior to radiologist interpretation. Just 37.5% reported formal protocol integration, and 43.6% had designated personnel for AI alert response. Access varied significantly across departments, and in only 61.7% of programs did all relevant team members have access. Formal implementation of the AI detection tools did not differ based on the certification (z = -0.2; p = 0.4) or whether the program was academic or community-based (z =-0.3; p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled LVO detection tools have the potential to improve stroke care and patient outcomes by expediting workflows and reducing treatment delays. This survey effectively evaluated current utilization of these tools and revealed widespread adoption alongside significant variability in access, integration, and workflow standardization. Larger, more diverse samples are needed to validate these findings across different hospital types, and further prospective research is essential to determine how formal integration of AI tools can enhance stroke care delivery, reduce disparities, and improve clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1138
Number of pages10
JournalNeurological research
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Triage/methods
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Stroke/diagnosis
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Male
  • Female

Cite this