Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Expert consensus for key components of a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note

  • Jonathan S Lall
  • , Said Maldonado
  • , Nicole B Lyons
  • , Gina Adrales
  • , Karla Bernardi
  • , Anne P Ehlers
  • , Hobart Harris
  • , Julie Holihan
  • , William Hope
  • , Jeffrey E Janis
  • , Michele Loor
  • , Clayton Petro
  • , Luke Putnam
  • , Caroline E Reinke
  • , John Scott Roth
  • , Christopher Senkowski
  • , Kendell Sowards
  • , Shirin Towfigh
  • , Daniel Dante Yeh
  • , Zuhair Ali
  • Mike K Liang
  • University of Houston
  • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
  • Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston
  • University of Michigan Medical School
  • University of California San Francisco Health
  • Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Department of Surgery
  • Keck School of Medicine of USC
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • University of Kentucky
  • Beverly Hills Hernia Center
  • Denver Health Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures by surgeons; however, there remains a lack of consensus for key components of operative reporting. Prior literature has identified several key elements that are recommended for inclusion in ventral hernia repair operative notes, but it is unclear whether these details alone make for a high-quality operative note. This study sought to determine whether experts agree on what factors make a ventral hernia repair operative note high-quality.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective exploratory sequential survey-based mixed-methods design was used for round 1. Conclusions via thematic analysis from survey responses were used to establish themes/subthemes to be included in a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note. Round 2 used a convergent design and sought to evaluate the importance of these identified themes/subthemes.

RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons were approached, 16 of whom completed both rounds. Nine themes and 3 subthemes were identified as essential for inclusion in a high-quality ventral hernia repair operative note. Round 2 determined that the 5 most important themes to include are accurate/adequate/pertinent details, clarity in writing, detailed/specific/comprehensive information, objective reporting of findings and procedures, and justification/rationale for decisions.

CONCLUSION: Based on expert consensus, this study suggests that high-quality operative notes require more than just detailed information. Instead, they must incorporate qualities spanning the 9 identified themes to ensure clarity, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109169
JournalSurgery
Volume181
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • Hernia, Ventral/surgery
  • Herniorrhaphy/standards
  • Humans
  • Consensus
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this