@article{4ac3eccbd1854fad891229630034066c,
title = "Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial",
author = "Ostlie, \{Daniel J.\} and Juang, \{Obinna O. Adibe David\} and Iqbal, \{Corey W.\} and Sharp, \{Susan W.\} and Snyder, \{Charles L.\} and Andrews, \{Walter S.\} and Sharp, \{Ronald J.\} and Holcomb, \{George W.\} and \{St. Peter\}, \{Shawn D.\}",
note = "Background Laparoscopy through a single umbilical incision is an emerging technique supported by case series, but prospective comparative data are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing single site umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy to 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods After IRB approval, patients were randomized to laparoscopic cholecystectomy via a single umbilical incision or standard 4-port access.",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/J.JPEDSURG.2012.10.039",
language = "American English",
volume = "48",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
number = "1",
}